Group: blocked
Posts: 24 IP-Address: saved
| about the most appropriate way to worship God. Having experienced both rites on a regular basis, and having worked hard to participate in each, I have come to the conclusion that the older form of the Mass in Latin and with the priest facing East, toward God is the objectively better form. This does not mean that I think that I am holier than anyone. That the rite is better has little to do with the people who assist at that rite. I know that I am a poor sinner who needs forgiveness and repentance. The older Mass has helped me to understand that much better than the new form, and this is one of the most important reasons that I think that it <a href=http://www.lijiangstudio.org/cheapfootballjerseys.html>cheap football jerseys</a> is better. July 20, 2010 at 5:52 pm 75 Paul says: Unlike most commentors, I am a little different. Since the age of 3 or 4, I have hardly attended an OF Mass. My parents left the local parish in the early 70 8242 s, I think Communion in the hand was the death nell that was years before it was officially approved . My Parish priest at the time was the only one in the parish who sympathised he gave me a bronze statue of St Paul which is still on my desk as I write But he felt he had to obey his bishop which according to Pope Benedict was not the case at all . <a href=http://www.cns-service.com/website.html>cheap college football clothing</a> So my parents sought out old retired priests still saying the Trad Mass. My parents believed that the guitars, extraordinary ministers and other abuses of the OF were a mockery and so refused to attend it at all. Sometimes we went 6 months without Mass, but even so, by the time I was about 14 and Masses were almost weekly again, I had learned the Latin almost by heart, and knew the meaning of all the prayers although the depth of meaning in the Traditional liturgy is something else. you can never plum
Topic from: http://thefeedtrust.org/index.php/member/73730/
|